Students and Guests Now Have Better Access to SBTS (#GCR)
Ryan Hutchinson describes the role inflation plays in theological education supported by the Cooperative Program. Despite an increase in CP receipts inflation has affected the “purchasing power” of those dollars thereby affecting our seminaries.
In a day where technological advancements could make theological education more accessible, we find our seminaries takings steps to make their campuses more accessible, read “attractive,” with a new entrance at Southern Seminary at a reported cost of $5,000,000. And, if we are not beautifying the campus with a new chapel or dressing up Pecan Manor, we are acquiring fragments of the Dead Sea Scrolls. It is not that these two investments are reckless. The question begging to be asked is just when cuts are being made and dollars are scarce, what about doing theological education? It is a bit like major insurance companies resisting health care reform then announcing ahead of the vote they will increase premiums by as much as 30%.
Hutchinson believes we need more money for theological education. The SBC Outpost reported in the past how a number of the seminary presidents were pushing for an offering akin to Lottie and Annie. Perhaps if some of our seminaries took a more aggressive approach to a new kind of theological education they would find more support for this idea from churches and not have to lobby the Executive Committee.
Donors like their names attached to large projects. How may we help them attach their dollars to students desiring theological education? That may be a good place for Hutchinson to put his energy.
And what seminary is he writing from?
WHAT? Quoting Ryan H.:
“Southern Baptists are the envy of the evangelical world when it comes to the use of combined giving to support convention-wide causes, but this is not a foregone conclusion for the coming decades.”
I must confess, I stop reading when I see a statement like that. I’ve hung around enough evangelical denominations and the only envy I’m aware of is Baptists’ ability to hold their liquor.
Bob,
You are too funny.
The comment you pick up is also curious for another reason. If the manner in which we define CP gifts change you can be sure the dollars given through the CP will be reduced. Micah Fries noted on his FB page his church had already done just that. Church autonomy will be parlayed into good reason to bypass certain entities in favor of others. Those leading once decried others who self-selected their funding options and bypassed the CP or chose to give more to their state conventions. The reversal is Orwellian.