Home > General > Spade

Spade

March 22nd, 2010 Marty Duren

It is really pitiful when a person has to come out of retirement to say things that must be said, but I now speak the truth in love as one should always do:

Needless.

Baseless.

Pointless.

Vacuous.

Void.

Unhelpful.

Bottom-feeding.

Inane.

Imbecilic.

Moronic.

Incomprehensible.

Nonsensical.

Mythical.

Useless.

Idiotic.

Unintelligent.

Self-aggrandizing.

Ego-stroking.

Unloving.

Unnecessary.

Thoughtless.

Worthless.

Small.

These are the most charitable terms I can find to describe the writings of Peter Lumpkins.

Categories: General Tags:
  1. March 22nd, 2010 at 11:32 | #1

    Marty takes the microphone.

  2. March 22nd, 2010 at 12:30 | #2

    Some things never change.

  3. March 22nd, 2010 at 12:46 | #3

    Well said.

  4. March 22nd, 2010 at 13:00 | #4

    C’mon, sir.

    Tell us how you really feel. Don’t hold back.

  5. March 22nd, 2010 at 17:39 | #5

    You know Marty, Peter prides himself on his skill at logic. However, in his post he fails to convince of his presuppositions.

    It could be argued those whom he considers courageous from our past are, as James Galyon noted in the comments where he was summarily dismiss and patronized, not near as courageous as Peter credits.

    The bigger misuse of digital print media was giving Lumpkins space on Baptist Press. Not sure whose genius that move was but it did nothing but feed the SBC equivalent to the Nazarene’s Ingrid Schlueter or Apprising’s Ken Silva – Peter L.

  6. March 22nd, 2010 at 18:05 | #6

    Everyone makes mistakes in judgment and I’d have to be at the front of that line. It is not too late, however, for BP to drop those articles for cause.

    If Lumpkins’ articles remain on the denominational media outlet, I see no reason that an upcoming series from Ben Cole should not be in the works there as well.

  7. March 23rd, 2010 at 00:00 | #7

    Marty,

    We have never met, but I think we are best friends.

    Matt

  8. March 23rd, 2010 at 13:10 | #8

    It is interesting to see how the loudest voices in debate seem to relish moments of cultural/leadership shift as an opportunity to make a name for themselves.

    Peter may see the GCR issue as his chance to become the SBC equivalent to the far-right “take up arms”-type radio shock jocks gaining influence politically right now. That or he simply knows with all the talk of change a brewing (oops, bad choice of words…), he can take his shots while emotions are high and get those who disagree with him to fight at his level and hurt their character reputation in the process.

    I’m not one of those people who minds differing opinions though. but I have a feeling that these things are only going to get nastier online before June.

  9. Marty Duren
    March 23rd, 2010 at 15:05 | #9

    @Josh C
    Josh said, he can take his shots while emotions are high and get those who disagree with him to fight at his level and hurt their character reputation in the process.

    Which is why I didn’t engage at his site. I wanted to say what I felt needed to be said without a bunch of back and forth. I’m not trying to convince Peter of anything; I’m sure he wouldn’t care anyway. That’s not the point.

    There are times that opposing views can be levied without a wrestling match.

    Thanks for your thoughts.

  10. Marty Duren
    March 23rd, 2010 at 18:34 | #10

    @Matt Svoboda
    It would be likely. Thx.

  11. April 2nd, 2010 at 22:57 | #11

    I really like what peter lumpkins has to say to the ermergent pastors like Troy gramerling at FRC in Cooper city, FL

    No egalitarians in the SBC

    eropdariwpapua

Comments are closed.